T20 & THE CHUCK LORRE SITCOM
Howard Wolowitz : [after everyone cheers for him and his team design going to space] It gets better! Someone has to go up with the telescope as a payload specialist, and guess who that someone is!
Sheldon Cooper : Mohammed Lee.
[everyone's looking confused]
Howard Wolowitz : Who's Mohammed Lee?
Sheldon Cooper : Mohammed is the most common first name in the world, and Lee the most common surname. As I didn't know the answer, I thought that gave me a mathematical edge.
This guy, Sheldon Cooper, is supposed to be the smartest man on the planet and he doesn't know Mutual Exclusivity in Probability. The "joke" could have juuuuuuust made sense in a general party or setting where there are "commoners" but this is among fellow nerds. Yet I'm not thinking about this when the setup/punchline occurs. The canned laugh behind tells me to laugh and I laugh. On the other end of the spectrum, take this brilliant setup and joke in Arrested Development:
Lucille: How's my son?
Literal Doctor: He's going to be alright.
[Everyone is relieved]
Literal Doctor: That's a great attitude. I've gotta tell you. If I was getting this news, I dunno that I'd take it this well.
Lucille: But...you said he was alright?
Literal Doctor: Yes. He's lost his left hand, so he's going to be all right.
This is such an ingeniously written sequence of events. When I saw it for the first time, I guffawed. Arrested ran for a grand total of 3 seasons and 53 episodes in its original run on FOX. Timely reminder that 2.5 Men ran for EIGHTY FIVE episodes after its star, Charlie Sheen, was fired. It's a different matter that Arrested's quality suffered in the later seasons but originally it was an amazingly well written sitcom with its call backs & foreshadowing and yet it never found an audience. Why? Cos people are too tired to spend their minds on what's happening. Like Kit Ramsey explains:
That's too much for the audience to think about. They have to know the guy's name is Cliff, that he's on a cliff, and that Cliff and cliff are the same. It's too cerebral. We're trying to make a movie here, not a film.
Take the Lord's test a few weeks ago. At the start of the day England were the favourites. The Indian tail broke a habit of a lifetime under Kohli and kept wigging and wagging. England then had to bat out two sessions on a fairly good wicket. The all-time great Indian attack reduced the home team to 90/7 with more than 20 overs left. Ollie Robinson resisted and resisted and took the match to the last hour with Jos Buttler for company. With less than 10 overs to go, Bumrah struck with an absolute peach of a slower ball. What was "peachier" was how he setup the dismissal with a mixture of short and full balls. Pure genius.
Why would or should one care about it? Only the wicket matters. IPL, and by extension, T20 takes this out of the equation. Wicket falls or six is hit and we can all go home. Why discuss such event within events? Booooring. Why would I care about this reference to Aleph-number in Futurama? I have to know what Aleph-nought is, I have to then cross-reference it and understand that the movie complex has infinite screens and chuckle at its impossibility. Eye-roll worthy crap. Instead just reference Dr. Who, Game of Thrones, Thundercats, Transformers, Star Trek, Star Wars all in one sentence that would make even Ranjit Fernando* blush, add a timely laugh track and I will happily laugh to my heart's content.
I finally get it. It took me years to get here but I get it: T20 is the Chuck Lorre sitcom of Cricket.
*-For those that aren't aware, Ranjit Fernando is a Sri Lankan commentator who had this incredible knack of speaking long sentences, not unlike Kannamba, without commas or full stops and would, more often than not, do it in one breath like that SPB song.
Comments
Post a Comment